Tumblelog by Soup.io
Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.

February 09 2010

February 08 2010

February 07 2010

kerim
23:35

Eduardo Mendieta Interviews Jurgen Habermas

Habermas_A2_5-300x277 Over at The Immanent Frame (excerpt can be found here):

EM: Over the last couple of years you have been working on the question of religion from a series of perspectives: philosophical, political, sociological, moral, and cognitive. In your Yale lectures from the fall of 2008, you approached the challenge of the vitality and renewal of religion in world society in terms of the need to rethink the link between social theory and secularization theory. In those lectures, you suggest that we need to uncouple modernization theory from secularization theory. Does this mean that you are taking distance from the dominant trends in social theory in the West, which began with Pareto, continued through Durkheim, and reached their apogee in Weber, and thus also from its explicit and avowed Eurocentrism?

JH: We should not throw out the baby with the bathwater. The debate over the sociological thesis of secularization has led to a revision above all in respect to prognostic statements. On the one hand, the system of religion has become more differentiated and has limited itself to pastoral care, that is, it has largely lost other functions. On the other hand, there is no global connection between societal modernization and religion’s increasing loss of significance, a connection that would be so close that we could count on the disappearance of religion. In the still undecided dispute as to whether the religious USA or the largely secularized Western Europe is the exception to a general developmental trend, José Casanova for example has developed interesting new hypotheses. In any case, globally we have to count on the continuing vitality of world religions.

In view of the consequences of which you speak, I consider the program of the group around Shmuel Eisenstadt and its comparative research on civilizations promising and informative. In the emerging world society, and concerning the social infrastructure, there are, as it were, by now only modern societies, but these appear in the form of multiple modernities because the great world religions have had a great culture-forming power over the centuries, and they have not yet entirely lost this power. As in the West, these “strong” traditions paved the way in East Asia, in the Middle East, and even in Africa for the development of cultural structures that confront each other today—for example, in the dispute over the right interpretation of human rights. Our Western self-understanding of modernity emerged from the confrontation with our own traditions. The same dialectic between tradition and modernity repeats itself today in other parts of the world.

kerim
17:03

Quote/Chart of the Day: The Sugar Lobby

Today's all purpose post begins with the quote of the day. It comes from the LA Times:

From the beginning, fast food and beverage company executives were uneasy about President Obama. He and his wife were known advocates of healthy eating.

That is scary! Advocates of healthy eating could pose a real problem. The industry's response is our chart of the day:

The entire story is worth reading. As a policy matter I'm not sure whether I support a tax on sugared beverages or not, but in the end it really doesn't matter. What matters is that the food industry doesn't want it, they're willing to spend a lot of money to make sure it never happens, and both interest groups and politicians are unwilling to risk losing their support. So, no tax.

Digg Facebook Twitter Reddit StumbleUpon 
kerim
03:09

[BBC] From a Calcutta brothel to a New York university

Avijit Halder - the son of a Calcutta sex worker - starts a film making course in the US as part of a dramatic transformation in his life.
Tags: South Asia
kerim
00:07

[GUK] New memoirs lift lid on La Dolce Vita era

The character played by Marcello Mastroianni in Federico Fellini's classic film was partly based on a gossip columnist now writing his own account of Rome's scandalous 1950s

When the gossip columnist Victor Ciuffa emerged blinking from a private viewing of La Dolce Vita in Rome in February 1960, he had one thought in his mind: the film he had just watched amounted to his life played out on the screen.

Federico Fellini's classic depiction of decadent American starlets and persistent photographers changed ­cinema forever. Now the journalist who chronicled 1950s life on Rome's glitzy Via Veneto and briefed Fellini for his film has decided to give his own definitive account of the era. As far as Ciuffa, now 77, is concerned, 50 years later he is setting the record straight, by writing La Dolce Vita, Minute by Minute.

"The real Dolce Vita started in Rome years before the cafés opened on Via Veneto and had as much to do with mys­terious deaths, drug abuse and debauched Roman aristocrats as with ­Hollywood," he said. While photographers such as Tazio Secchiaroli have long been seen as inspirations for Paparazzo, the character in La Dolce Vita who gave celebrity-chasing photographers their name, Ciuffa claims he provided source material for the cynical columnist-about-town, played to laconic perfection by Marcello Mastroianni. "Ciuffa lived that period intensely; I am sure Fellini was inspired by the work he was doing," said Elio Sorci, another photographer who prowled Via Veneto at the time.

Like Mastroianni's character, Ciuffa enjoyed a middle-class provincial upbringing before plunging into the Rome demi-monde by chance. His first big assignment as a cub reporter was the mysterious death in 1953 of Wilma Montesi, a 21-year-old whose body was found on a beach at Ostia, Rome's port. Witnesses suggested Montesi had been dumped in the sea after overdosing at a sex-and-drugs party attended by the cream of Rome's aristocracy, held at a hunting lodge on land owned by Italy's former royal family, the House of Savoy.

"The Dolce Vita started at that party," said Ciuffa. "I noticed that witnesses were regulars at a bar on Via del Babuino, which was the hangout for existentialists and artists living on Via Margutta, led by the artist Novella Parigini, who caused a stir when she put America's first transsexual, Christine Jorgensen, in a horse buggy and paraded her round Rome." The city's aristocrats were prowling for foreign girls to invite back to their palazzi, a scene later re­created in La Dolce Vita. A then unknown Ursula Andress dated a count until he threw a bottle at her head during a row. The Felixstowe-born actress Dawn Addams became a princess in 1954 when she married into a family descended from a general in the Roman empire.

Fifty years on, for Ciuffa the memories are still fresh. Such as the time, in June 1956, when a well-known pusher who had been exiled by Mussolini to Calabria before the war got into a fight in a bar. He was accused of passing off bicarbonate of soda as cocaine. "The police arrived and arrested a count, a marquis and a prince," said Ciuffa. The bar owner decided to shut down, but in 1958 quietly reopened for business at the Café de Paris on Via Veneto, which became a magnet for US actors arriving at the big hotels on the street. As the Dolce Vita took off, Hollywood was discovering the low cost of film-making in Rome and the high jinks to be had.

Soon working as a gossip columnist at Corriere d'Informazione, Ciuffa was first to write up a scandalous striptease by a Turkish dancer in a Trastevere nightclub in November 1958, which finally alerted the world to the licentious and wealthy lifestyle that became known as the Dolce Vita. On that particular night, the Swedish actress Anita Ekberg danced barefoot, a scene she would recreate in Fellini's film, before Aiche Nana stripped to her knickers, egged on by the usual crowd of "aristos", who fled when the police arrived.

"I received the photos taken by Tazio ­Secchiaroli the next morning and rang the police. 'Nothing happened,' they said. 'If you journalists don't talk about this, nothing happened.' I wrote a long story and by lunchtime news vendors in Milan were yelling 'Scandal'." By this time Ciuffa was meeting Fellini regularly at the Café de Paris before the director started filming La Dolce Vita in 1959. "He wanted to hear about the parties that I was going to."

As the appetite for celebrity gossip exploded, stars grinning at the camera were no longer good enough. "Many shots of actors brawling with photographers were arranged by both parties in advance," said Ciuffa, who was not shy of creating news on a dull night. "We found two cigar-smoking Cubans at the Café de Paris who agreed to deliver roses at 2am to Ava Gardner's address. Her assistant called the police, who arrested the Cubans. Sometimes you needed to make it up."

Despite keeping a satirical tone in his articles, Ciuffa was taken aback when he saw La Dolce Vita at a preview held by Fellini. "When I saw the film, I realised how celebrity warps characters and the stars who flocked to Via Veneto saw themselves as gods," he said.

From that day on, Ciuffa adopted the pen name Ugo Naldi for his gossip column. "I really considered stopping, but I needed the money. My editor was in the habit of calling up to say, 'Send me a piece that will give this paper an erection!' "


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


February 06 2010

kerim
06:46

Santa Fe Institute economist: one in four Americans is employed to guard the wealth of the rich

Here's a fascinating profile on radical Santa Fe Institute economist Samuel Bowles, an empiricist who says his research doesn't support the Chicago School efficient marketplace hypothesis. Instead, Bowles argues that the wealth inequality created by strict market economics creates inefficiencies because society has to devote so much effort to stopping the poor from expropriating the rich. He calls this "guard labor" and says that one in four Americans is employed to in the sector -- labor that could otherwise be used to increase the nation's wealth and progress.

The greater the inequalities in a society, the more guard labor it requires, Bowles finds. This holds true among US states, with relatively unequal states like New Mexico employing a greater share of guard labor than relatively egalitarian states like Wisconsin.

The problem, Bowles argues, is that too much guard labor sustains "illegitimate inequalities," creating a drag on the economy. All of the people in guard labor jobs could be doing something more productive with their time--perhaps starting their own businesses or helping to reduce the US trade deficit with China.

Guard labor supports what one might call the beat-down economy. Community Action's Porter sees it all the time.

"We have based almost everything we have done on the idea that we always need a part of our workforce that is marginalized--that we can call this group into action at any time, pay them nothing and they will do anything that needs to be done," she says.

More discouraging, perhaps, is the statistical fact that a person born into this workforce has little chance of rising beyond it.

Born Poor? (via MeFi)

Older posts are this way If this message doesn't go away, click anywhere on the page to continue loading posts.
Could not load more posts
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...
Just a second, loading more posts...
You've reached the end.